subscribe: Posts | Comments

leader

Ahmedinejad and Obama at the UN

4 comments

Of statesmanship and political pandering….

By Dr Franklin Lamb

Beirut, Lebanon:

For westerners, and particularly Americans who have watched Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad up fairly close as he delivers speeches in the US and elsewhere including during last year’s visit to Lebanon, his charisma and populist connection with the public are evident and often powerful.

And President Barack Obama is normally no slough either on the stump when he woes voters and inspires them to support his point of view. But last week’s UN appearance by the two leaders left a Matthew 13:24-30 type image of the wheat being separated from the chaff.  Both countries are juxtaposed menacingly in the Middle East, one pressuring the region in an all-out sustained NATO utilized effort to maintain its hegemony and the other actively trying to lead the region in a very different direction. Consequently the public was presented with an interesting contrast in styles and substance.

The two appearances could be handicapped along the lines that Obama’s tough job was to try to shore up Israel whose days as a dominate force in the Levant rapidly grow fewer as history corrects the nearly incalculable injustice that 

resulted from the West’s implantation of the racist state and as history inexorably deconstructs the world’s last 19th Century colonial enterprise.

From the UN podium, Ahmadinejad knew in advance that approximately 15 minutes into his speech began AIPAC would signal the launch of its churlish and infantile 30 country walkout and most of the delegations in the audience knew that the White House had given its ok. The Iranian President also knew that there would be the pro-Zionist tabloid media blitz against him complete with the now expected degrading and offensive cartoons and the Persian visitor being labeled in the US media, what else, but an “anti-Semite”, “a clown”, “weirdo”, “crackpot”. “the new Hitler” and the usual moronic libels.  It is hard to imagine that the New York Times editors actually read his speech since they not only failed it analyze it but simply dismissed it as a “tirade” the same description they applied last year.

But this year, the AIPAC/White House walk-out backfired and it was roundly condemned not only among the American public but among the publics of each of the countries 

that agreed to rudely interrupt the proceedings. The Zionist controlled US government failed to realize that the international public, like most Americans, by and large retain respect for the values of open dialogue, common hospitality and respect for leaders from other countries.  Moreover, they understand that the raison d’etre of the United Nations is to provide its members with an open forum.  This includes Iran and each of the 192 other UN Member States. When Obama spoke the Iranian delegation listened respectfully.

OBAMA the compleat politician?

President Obama, embarrassingly for the American public proved once more his habit of assuming the role of the groveling US politician for the pariah Israeli UN Member. This latest speech was no exception and once more Obama made plain that he will support Israel’s continuing occupation of Palestine as a quid pro quo for the Israeli lobby funding and supporting his 2012 Presidential re-election bid.

Birzeit University Professor Hanan Ashrawi, spoke for many in the audience and across America after Obama finished:  “I did not believe what I heard.  It sounded as if the 

Palestinians were occupying Israel.  There was no empathy for the Palestinians; he only spoke of the Israeli problems. He told us that it isn’t easy to achieve peace, thanks, we know this.  He spoke about universal rights, Good; those same rights apply to Palestinians. The White House is applying

enormous pressure on everybody at the UN and they are using threats and coercion.  I wish they would invest the same energy in an attempt to promote peace, not threats.”

Has Iran have produced a Statesman or a sycophant?

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is at his best when he is engaged in dialogue and debate according to people in Lebanon and Iran who know him well.  But he gets to the point quickly and it sometimes catches his interlocutors off-guard if they aren’t prepared.

Devoutly religious, Iran’s President is unerringly polite and respectful, and never fails to mention the positive and the necessity of dialogue and seeking common ground.

But he speaks frankly and also noted that President Obama never made good on a pledge to try to improve US-Iranian relations and to open a dialogue with Iran, and said he still hopes for a face-to-face meeting. “I don’t believe that this is a chance that has been completely lost,” Ahmadinejad said.

He told Iran’s fellow UN Members “You all know that the nuclear issue has been turned and manipulated into a political issue,” and he added that Iran remains ready to negotiate over its disputed nuclear program, and repeated the country’s position that the program is for the peaceful production of energy

Following the 2009 disputed Iranian elections, he stated We were very much in support of change. I sent a personal message to President Obama, but we never received a response.

His UN speech theme was that most nations of the world are unhappy with the current international circumstances. “And despite the general longing and aspiration to promote peace, progress, and fraternity, wars, mass-murder, widespread poverty, and socioeconomic and political crises continue to infringe upon the rights and sovereignty of nations, leaving behind irreparable damage worldwide.” He continued, “Approximately, three billion people of the world live on less than 2.5 dollars a day, and over a billion people live without having even one sufficient meal on a daily basis. Forty-percent of the poorest world populations only share five percent of the global income, while twenty percent of the richest people share seventy-five percent of the total global income. More than twenty thousand innocent and destitute children die every day in the world because of poverty.”

He challenged the United Nations to reform itself and he urged honest debate on the vital issues confronting the world community. He asked

the UN to bear in mind who imposed colonialism for over four centuries, who occupied lands and massively plundered resources of other nations, destroyed talents, and alienated languages, cultures and identities of nations?

He asked the UN members to join in solutions to the World’s problems but asked that we not hide the facts of:

·         Who triggered the first and second world wars, that left seventy millions killed and hundreds of millions injured or homeless. Who created the wars in Korean peninsula and in Vietnam?

·         Who imposed through Zionism and over sixty years of war, homelessness, terror and mass murder on the Palestinian people and on countries of the region?

·         Who imposed and supported for decades military dictatorship and totalitarian regimes on Asian, African, and Latin American nations?

·         Who used nuclear bomb against defenseless people, and stockpiled thousands of warheads in their arsenals?

·         Whose economies rely on waging wars and selling arms?

·         Who provoked and encouraged Saddam Hussein to invade and impose an eight-year war on Iran, and who assisted and equipped him to deploy chemical weapons against our cities and our people?

·         Who used the mysterious September 11 incident as a pretext to attack Afghanistan and Iraq, killing, injuring, and displacing millions in two countries with the ultimate goal of bringing into its domination the Middle East and its oil resources?

·         Who nullified the Breton Woods system by printing trillions of dollars without the backing of gold reserves or equivalent currency? A move that triggered inflation worldwide and was intended to prey on the economic gains of other nations?

·         Which country's military spending exceeds annually a thousand billion dollars, more than the military budgets of all countries of the world combined?
 

·         Who dominates the policy-making establishments of the world economy?

·         Who are responsible for the world economic recession, and are imposing the consequences on America, Europe and the world in general?

·         Who are the ones dominating the Security Council which is ostensibly responsible for safeguarding the international security?

This month’s Iran-U.S Presidential addresses at the United Nations have given its members a clear choice for the challenges quickly engulfing the Middle East. Ultimately, as the popular awakenings in this region teach us, it is the citizens of each country who have the power to decide how to deal with these crises.

Iran’s President demonstrated at Turtle Bay this month that he understands the problems, offers rational solutions and is ready for constructive dialogue.  The next move is up to President Obama to extricate him and his country from the jaws of Zionism and to join with Iran and the community of nations with constructive proposals to help alleviate the challenges Iran’s President enumerated.


 

GD Star Rating
loading...
Ahmedinejad and Obama at the UN, 9.5 out of 10 based on 18 ratings
468 ad
  1. Its time to unite for justice/peace/truth/determination/freedom for all!
    Perhaps many valid questions President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad may never be answered by those who only see the world one-way/one-direction, US israel india must take deeper insight onto avoiding conflicts.
    The will of people one day triumphs look USSR also had to pay heed to aspiring nations seeking freedom.
    Why bullying nations oppose justice/peace/truth/determination/freedom?
    Why they don't buy "PEACE" at-every-cost however, some rather prefer WAR at-every-cost?
    We are at tipping point now, PEACE must be bought at-every-cost!

  2. those who walked out are just bullies and butchers and cannot take the truth.
    they should look to their own history – mention this and they have immediate  and/or selectiveamnesia. what the likes of lord (aren't the glorifier of terrorism titled! otherwise how would the ugly royal haveempire to enslave, rape, destroy and parasitically commonwealth – it is all mine kitschy crassness) carey will not say.
    what has the bloody crown offered to the humanity? Slavery, 25 + GENOCIDE, RAPE; MASS DESTRUCTION, ATROCIOUS BRUTAL PERFIDIOUS OCCUPATION;……………………….. 
    this is what the lords will not say in the halls of their cult-

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2005/dec/27/eu.turkey
    These are just two examples of at least 20 such atrocities overseen and organised by the British government or British colonial settlers; they include, for example, the Tasmanian genocide, the use of collective punishment in Malaya, the bombing of villages in Oman, the dirty war in North Yemen, the evacuation of Diego Garcia. Some of them might trigger a vague, brainstem memory in a few thousand readers, but most people would have no idea what I'm talking about.

    ——————————————-
    AMNESIA + GLORIFICATION of the bloody barbarity is what those who walked out DO/DID and are still doing -the kitschy crassness of the revolting butcher of Merkrl the evil figure to German atrocity
    http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2009/09/09/the-kunduz-massacre-the-real-nature-of-a
    It is now clear that in the course of Thursday night at least 125 persons were killed in the attack, which had been ordered by the military commander of the German “Provincial Reconstruction Team” (PRT) in Kunduz, Colonel Georg Klein. In addition to armed fighters, the attack wiped out many inhabitants of neighbouring villages. The incident was one of the bloodiest air strikes since US forces invaded the country in the autumn of 2001.
    Such a massacre is not the result of “bad decisions”, an alleged “disregard of NATO rules” or an “unclear situation”. It is the inevitable result of the objective logic of the US-led military intervention in Afghanistan
    The only unity among the NATO partners is that demonstrated against the Afghan population, which they are seeking to suppress. In fact, the conflicts between the “allies” over the allocation of booty and zones of influence in Afghanistan and the entire region are intensifying

  3. The US has found another black face to cheerlead for another unjust,unprovoked war.More false claims of wmd's.When will they ever learn?

  4. if enough people go to police stations and demand that david cameron be arrested for war crimes plus nick clegg and all the other war criminals in government surely it would create publicity to wake more people up and if they are innundated with form filling they should have to do something or am i just being naive ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>