subscribe: Posts | Comments

leader

Anglo-Saxon Law Is The Tool

26 comments

Font Size » Large | Small


For Remote Invisible Hold On Former Colonies

By Naveed Tajammal

When the European powers colonized in Asia and Africa, they not only destroyed their language, culture and social and religious values but they even replaced their laws and the source of jurisprudence.

Without changing the fundamentals of the society, they could not develop their hold on the mindset of the colonized people and societies. Thus in the light of this, British East India Company became the vanguard of the onslaught of the English culture, language, morals, ethics etc. Even the attempt was made to distract the people from their basic faith and Deen, Islam. To them Islam was the only potent threat that could and would come in their way of dominance, hence all these factions that are seen in Islam, most have been aired and supported by them. So much so that even new prophets were brought forward the followers of whom even today act and perform the agenda of the Zionists and their British Masters.

In order to complete the strangulation over the Muslim society, the anglo-saxon law was introduced, a law totally based on the whims of the King or the Queen at that time. It was done with complete mastery when handpicked were sent to England to study there in institutions like Oxford, Cambridge, Lincoln's Inn etc. to get absorbed in the British culture and way of life. These when brought back, became the agents for change. They were awarded titles and jagirs to live a life that would dominate the others within their own societies. These became the elites and the enlightened class from within the British Slaves of the sub-continent.

Now these remnants of the English Masters have become more British, they have become the masters of the destiny and the twisters of the fate of the local people. Today they dominate the Parliaments, bureaucracy and even the military to some extent.

Today even amongst our so called enlightened class, an impression exists what to speak of the westerners that the Islamic laws are antiquated, medieval & of the dark ages, some have gone so far that they have termed Islamic laws to be draconian. Now as a comparison let us see, from where the so called enlightened parties cherished laws, the Anglo Saxon, based from. Briefly stated, the very term Anglo Saxon is commonly applied to that period of English history, language & literature, which precedes, the Norman conquest of Britain (1066 AD) by a William ,who lead on to the British island colonies of Scandinavians, who had earlier settled in Normandy across the English Channel and had over the time, adopted French language and ways and manners too. This is the time of Alfred (d. 900AD) who for reasons best known to the British alone, has been blessed with a title of ‘the great’ which cannot be so, if calling that a rule over some petty counties can be called his greatness, yes, a large landlord he may have been. As the bulk of the British island was then under the Danish rule, their King, was named “Guthrum,” the city of London too was a Danish city, in the year 893AD came a fresh influx of Danes onboard 330 ships, they invaded and took over the present Kent region, to the East of London, which has the port of Dover. The point to highlight is can this Alfred be in any way called a great law giver, and what did he rule on which these laws if any, had been implemented ??

While the British boast of their great kings and one of them has just been highlighted, let us go back further in time then, this Alfred, the year is 732 AD, and Muslim armies are in Central France, the battle of Tours has been a check on their expansionism, the Islamic laws are already enforced in Spanish peninsula, the whole of north Africa, middle east, till the confines of the Sind valley and in the north till Kashgar. Now if we jump forward the same laws are also in the period of Suleiman the magnificent of the ottomans (1520-1566AD), and cover most of eastern Europe, north Africa, Middle East, till Baghdad. The Central Asian Turks too followed the same laws as did the Turkish rulers of what was the British India., to an extent. They the British should know the extent of the writ of the Islamic laws and a long line of rulers exists who in reality were great kings, and they upheld the laws of our book the holy Quran, THERE WERE NO CONCORDATS, neither did the right of Divine rule ever exist in the Muslim rule.

The British to give antiquity to their feeble laws drag the time backwards, from their beloved Alfred, they say ,in fact it was the laws as drafted by a ‘Ethelbert’ who sat on their throne, in 560AD,in the area now in ‘Kent; already mentioned before ,who first drafted their laws !!

Let us give them a benefit of doubt, what they fail to understand is that at THIS, time in the world history existed THE ACTUAL, great law giver and known for his ‘just’ rule and ruling as ‘The Adil’ or ‘The Just,’’ he is called Khusro  Pervaiz  the first, and also as’’ Nausherwan.’’ HIS EMPIRE WAS FROM NORTH AFRICA TILL YEMEN AND THE CONFINES OF THE EASTERN LIMITS OF THE SIND VALLEY. THERE IS A LONG LIST OF VASSAL KINGS, who were on the fringes of his empire.

The English may not like this but, ’Aetheberth’ was a pirate, and logically what laws could he have given other then how to rip off or the theory of a good ‘Con’? However the British insist that after him, there was a long line of law givers, starting from a,’ ’Hlothhere, Eadric, Withraed, the Ine the King of Wessex (688-726AD), and so on till Alfred, the same man who signed the ‘Treaty of Peace with the Danish king Guthrum’.

In the second phase, of improvements, it is stated it was the work of Northumbrian priests, and the customs of the North people, and these had been entered in a book, called ‘’The Doomsday Book’, However in reality, this book, is a record of an survey of England, completed in 1086 AD, for William 1st, it was done to access, the worth of each farmer, and his livestock, so he could be TAXED !!!

Now we come to Third phase of the improvements in the Anglo Saxon laws as claimed by the British, study the profiles of their kings & their actions and see if, they can be termed as the law drafters.

Edward the confessor (d.1066) they say he was called the confessor on account of his sanctity, however the actual man was far from a saint ,he raided the queen-mothers treasury ,seized her possessions ,and compelled her to live in retirement ,in desolate conditions ,not only did the queen mother suffer, at his hands but, his own wife ,the daughter of Earl Godwine, was as badly treated and banished then locked in a ‘monastery’, the second great English improver is Henry the first ,he was third in line ,to the English crown, the eldest by the name of Robert, decided to go for the crusades ,the middle brother was killed by Henry while on a hunting trip, after his death, Henry, married the daughter of king of Scots (Malcolm iii ) and made arrangements with Church, and so took over the English throne, he married twice never had a legitimate child, but a long line of illegitimates, the most famous was Earl of Gloucester, so these two (Edward and Henry) have the honor of drafting the Anglo Saxon laws, in the third phase!!!

In the fourth phase, the British have become a super power the time is the start of 20th century, now it is alleged that all the charters, enactments, as well the private arrangements of their kings and queens are part of the laws. Which really meant a legal cover to an entrenched feudal system, with an arrangement with their church, but for the general public at large, these laws are broadcasted as the best, thing on the Earth.

Let us now study briefly who these English people really are, to have an insight in their Anglo Saxon laws, as they are based on their religion, customs & values, which have been reproduced in them.

In the category of ,’’Angleleyn’ come  the lot called English, who hailed from the counties of East Anglia, Mercia & Northumria, the Saxons, hailed from the counties of, Essex, Sussex & wessex .The British claim that the term Anglo Saxon was in vogue before Alfred’s time .i.e. 800AD.In reality this race is a hotch –potch of vagabonds and pirates on the run or the castoffs of mainland Europe.

Now we enter the period when these laws were imposed on us, After the fall of the Sikh kingdom, in 1849 AD the British felt that now they could impose their laws on us ,it should be borne in mind that we broke away from the Mughal Empire in 1739 AD, after Nadir Shah’s invasion. So after a lapse of 110 years we came in the fold as whole in the British Empire.

It was Lord William Bentinck, who had ordered that Persian should be abolished ,and be replaced by Urdu and English ,as per the Resolution of March 7th 1835.Bentinck,the Governor General of the East India  Company, was strongly in the favor and a supporter of ‘’Macaulayian system’, which promoted English literature ,language & English Medium Schools ,After the Annexation of Sikh state in 1849,this system was set in motion here too, as well in rest of the Sind valley, where ever the writ of the union jack existed .In April 1851,the Commissioner Multan Division, had recommended that Urdu and English be declared the Court Language, and be fully enforced in three years timei.e.1854 AD. The policy was adopted for other divisions ,John Lawrence of Punjab fame had remarked in his write up on this subject, that,’ ’’It should be considered that Urdu is not the language of these divisions, neither is Persian , but Urdu is well understood by the majority of our officers, whereas Persian is Not’’.

To enforce this new language ,at grass root levels, in the Tehsile level courts ,an Urdu Gazette  was introduced called ‘’Sarkari Akhbar’ which gave a summary of news of the month ,abstracts of important trials and orders, changes ,appointments and dismissals’ ’,with it also came with states blessings three Urdu  newspapers, Pasia Akhbar ,Zamindar & Chaudiween Sadi (14thcentury).

To a common person Urdu remained the proverbial ‘GREEK ’,and so was ‘’ENGLISH’ ,as each word had to be translated back in his language By the Bengali Babbu’s & vakils, however, most were clueless of our language .so the Urdu implant grew roots ,courtesy the ‘Ferengi  & Bengali Clerks.’ and so ended Arabic and Persian, in the courts ,but primarily Persian, Arabic and the teachings of Islamic Jurisprudence survived in underground Madressahs till these were begun to be taught in regular universities. Anglo Saxon law stepped in, the Courtyard of the courts, and still holds firm, i.e. 1854-2010, a period of 156 years, out of which we have been independent for, 63 years!!!

As Lord Coroner mentioned in his book, Modern Egypt in 1908 that Britain is prepared to accord political independence to all its colonies as and when they adopt and conform to them to the British ways of life, education, culture etc. but under no circumstances would any Muslim colony be granted independence. Now when we have a hindsight, that analogy appears to be true.

Naveed Tajammal has over 26 years of experience in Investigative Historical Research. His primary focus is on Indus Cvilisation but his grasp of the histories of the world are amazing. He has been writing for various papers and publications. Presently he is on the panel of Advisors of Opinion Maker since its inception.

To be continued……

Web-Stat web traffic analysis

 

GD Star Rating
loading...
Anglo-Saxon Law Is The Tool, 10.0 out of 10 based on 2 ratings
468 ad
  1. WELL SAID NAVEED TAJAMMAL ONE CAN ONLY HOPE THE PEOPLE WHO READ COMPREHEND YOUR MESSAGE AS WELL.

  2. our people still follow the english laws the turks follow the french laws as stated by you in your earlier article on secularism,when will our muslims wake up.

  3. Naveed you will have to continue your articles till the point drills home,followers you get but time it will take. so keep up the good work. a salute.

  4. The English pirates also destroyed the ancient laws, customs and language of their near neighbours, the irish. They only gave us our so-called independence once we had been anglisised. Very few can speak our native tounge with any degree of fluency, it is a tragedy. I hope you can regain your full cultural panopoly as is every peoples right on this beautiful planet

    • Ragnork:
      You are a good person,and also understand the plight in which these pirates and petty shop keepers have put us all in.
      let us pray that a big tidal wave devours them,and Irish take over the surviving nitwits and make them their slaves for the next thousand years.
      AMEN.

  5. What a load of bunkum! I have never read such rot which pretends to be scholarly! As for “Ragnarok” are you living in fantasy Ireland? Ireland was never a united one people island in 3000 years until the British and why should it be or have been?Just like the mainland. The language was never homogenous either because of the different tribes you dip stick! Try reading some history books and as for the author of this BS stop writing twisted propaganda as if nobody with half a brain will read it!

    • Thor,
      what an ass you are,you are the half brained here you just read it and posted your stupid remarks.

    • Thor, the Irish were never united? As I recall, there is a long line of Irish High Kings who did bring unity. Enough unity, in fact, that in the year 1014 under the High King Brian Boru, the Irish were able to repel the Danish invaders. The self-superior English never managed to accomplish that feat, but instead succumbed to multiple Norse invasions.

  6. Anglo Saxon says:

    I am English, and I am being made increasingly angry as I learn more and more about what has been done in my name by the Zionist criminals who have for too long controlled my country out of London: or to be more precise, the City of London.

    We ordinary English do not owe anyone an apology. Readers might like to note that the first Slaves used in the Plantations of the Southern United States were English and Irish indentured workers and petty criminals … meaning the first slaves in the USA were White and NOT Black!

    The spider at the centre of this web is the Rothschild Banking Dynasty and its many allies. It is they who have financed every crooked and evil deed committed outside of China, since the late 18th century. Until they are no more, then your problems and my problems will only continue. Please understand the City of London is not English territory: the Square Mile is sovereign territory with its own laws and separate police force.

    • Who cares about who the first slaves were ? we are talking about the after shock , the long term effects of an action , we are talking about the magnitude of the callousness of the european slave-traders. Can you give me a figure or estimate of the number of irish people that were taken to the americas . Well, the number of africans dragged thousands of miles to the new world over a period of 250 years is in excess of 90 million . Most of them died along the way

      What is the standard of living of the english and irish people today compared to that of the africans scattered all over the northern hemisphere ? . what is the state of africans today ? .

      The african slavery is the most overlooked action in the entire human history . The jewish holocaust despite being dwarfed multiple times by the african slavery , still gets more sympathy from the world than africans will get . there was the herero holocaust in namibia carried out by the germans , we hear nothing about that . The jews got a nation , they get billions of dollars from the US government
      , what do africans get but humiliation and denigration .

      The jews owned ships that transported slaves from africa to america

      lastly , you let your racist mentality cloud your honest thinking faculty . the number of irish slaves taken to the americas was no more than 40,000 . They were men taken after a conflict . Africans did nothing to deserve the treatment they got from europeans .

      • Anglo Saxon says:

        All African slaves were first enslaved by other Africans. They were then sold on to Jewish transatlantic slave traders operating out of Rhode Island, USA whose ships would cross to West Africa with Rum and Whisky and return via the Caribbean with their holds full of slaves.

        Black slaves only made an appearance in the Southern States of America because White Slaves had no immunity to Malaria. Black slaves had that immunity, and the first arrived in the USA, not from Africa, but via auctions held on other Caribbean Islands following a collapse in the price of sugar in Europe.

        Long before so-called “white” slave merchants appeared in Africa (the Portuguese were the first) Africans were selling Black African slaves to people in the Middle East (the Ottoman Empire). African slaves were being employed in the Muslim world for many centuries before Europeans joined in this activity.

        All these facts have been proven by research. Curedcat is allowing his bitter emotions to get the better of his thinking.

  7. SO thor,the god of the Scandinavians why you fool,you blighters do not even your own god,even for a god you run to the north,naveed tajammal has correctly narrated your past,indeed your lot are the castoffs and vagabonds of main continent of Europe.

  8. John Hendricks says:

    Very interesting. Though I am of English descent via the American Revolution, I have no doubt of the veracity of the article. It is a deception that carries through to the present day – and not just among the peoples of the Islamic faith, but all of humanity. We have all been deceived.

  9. Buster Hieman says:

    WHAT A BUNCH OF BLOODY TRIPE!!!

  10. Now it is tripe is it,Buster,well remember the sausages you eat so lovingly the outer is the yummy tripe.
    Eat your heart out,Buster,your lot has been exposed for good,
    and your dirty smelly laws.

  11. Theory for point is the Anglo-Saxon law and Wergeld has ruled Britain since the fall of Rome. Britain, the english language, and the world system of today are all Anglo-Saxon.

  12. For years I wondered, if there can be a Computer or Software that would project what the world be like, had the British, not existed.

    Imagine they plundered, India and Africa, to name a few and when the exploits got too expensive for them, they hand these people back their own countries and called it Independence. Weren’t they independent before?

    India, Pakistan, and all the African nations should abandon this “Independence” celebration and stop putting prominence to it. It is simply an insult to these nations.

  13. Werner H6er0ann says:

    Naveed completely ignores that the root off the anglo-saxon laws lie in the Germanic law principles of a society of equals with basic rights afforded to every man and acces to due process – just look at the Magna Charta. That various scoundrel-kings abused the system (just look at todays politicians) does not invalidate the underlying principles. And to say that the size of the jurisdiction determines its validity is asinine. Having said that, I certainly believe that every society is entitled to their own approach on how to handle disagreements among its members. If you don’t like the anglo saxon approach and prefer Sharia, go right ahead, but please let the members of your society choose freely.

  14. markus wallett says:

    Lol, the English are of West Germanic origin, not Scandinavian (North Germanic). Get your facts right. The Angles (or Engle to give them their proper name) originated from Angeln in Northern Germany and gave their name to England. English and British are two entirely different things.

  15. If you don’t like Anglo Saxon Law, feel free to go and live in Saudi Arabia. I am sure their medieval inhuman laws will be more appealing to you.

    Eye gouging and blinding
    Stoning to death
    Cutting off hands, feet etc
    Floggings etc, etc, etc

    Yeah, Anglo Saxson law sucks…….

  16. Skip the tripe and “DIVISIVE” nonsense, cut to the chase….BURN A TALMUD FOR JESUS….there were never any ASHKENAZIM PROSELYTES TO TALMUDIC JUDAISM IN EGYPT…the “jewish” NARRATIVE is a LIE….Truth doesn’t go away just because someone misunderstands history….See Stone of Destiny. Obadiah and Matthew 13. [Issa Nakhleh & Elizabeth Dilling and Juri Lina] apfn.org.

  17. the common law is the law of the people and is indeed a very good law (for the people whose culture it was).

    Brought to other countries it may not fit the culture.

    But is is all the time better than laws supposedly to come from a God who shows no justice at all. Who kills and maims at will. The God (Allah) is far worse than your pamphlet about british Kings. The people indeed had a lot of power during that time and the common law protected the PEOPLE against their rulers. Thus it is all the time better than a despotic Ayatollah who is not checked by the law but justifies his despotism in the name of a cruel God.

    Laws have to present justice and justice is what people feel is just. It not the rules a powerful person makes to maintain his power, be he religious or political.

    As democracy (not the one we have but the real one) is a feature of white people and therefore the laws in common laws respect that.

    Third world countries have been ruled by kings and religous leaders. their laws were always the laws of the King/Ayatollah or whatever you call them.

    Common law, applied in a well meaning way was certainly an improvement to despotic countries.

  18. DEAR WERNER,
    PERHAPS A PEEP IN YOUR OWN COUNTRIES PAST WILL DO YOU GOOD,IF YOU HAD GOOD LAWS OR THE ANGLO SAXON WHICH YOU JUSTIFY,THEN THE LEGENDS OF ROBIN HOODS IN YOUR DIFFERENT EPOCHS WOULD NOT EXIST,english HAVE BRUTALLY KILLED IRISH & SCOTS ,PERHAPS GUY FAWKES WAS CORRECT,AS WAS OLIVER CROMWELL,YOU HAVE A ROTTEN FEUDAL SYSTEM,READ OUR PAST,WHEN YOU PEOPLE WERE IN SKINS AND FURS WE HAD MANY A TIMES COMPLETED THE CIRCLE OF WISDOM & ZENITH OF CIVILIZATION ,AND WHEN I SAY WE,I MEAN THE PEOPLE OF EAST.RECALL YOUR GOTHIC ARCHITECTURE SEE THE CONICAL TURRETS THEY REPRESENT THE OLD CONICAL HEADGEAR OF THE TURK,IT WAS WARPED,AS IN TURBAN, YOU ARE SO STUPID YOU USE THE SAME,YET YOU GIVE THE SAME TO YOUR CLOWN AS THE HEADGEAR ,NOW THAT IS BEING GROSSLY STUPID.
    KNOWLEDGE IS ACQUIRED BY STUDY AND COMPREHENSION,A SUBJECT NOT WITHIN YOUR AMBIT, AND SAYS WHO THAT THE AYATOLLAH IS OUR IDEAL ??? THE SIZE OF JURISDICTION OF THE LAW DOES MATTER AND THE PERIOD IT LASTS UNCHECKED TOO MATTERS, ARE YOU AWARE T,WHAT ARE THE EXACT REGIONAL BOUNDARIES OF RUM’ &’ WHO THE ACTUAL ‘RUMI’ IS ? WHOM YOU CALL THE ROMAN ??? AND FROM WHERE THESE LAWS CAME FROM ? SWEET HEART EVEN YOUR GREEK PHILOSOPHY IS BASED ON WHAT THEY CALLED THE ‘BARBARIANS’ AND DO YOU KNOW WHOM THEY REFER ED, TOO ???

  19. Mr. Naveed, the British did the same thing to Malaysia. They secularised our constitution whilst majority of us are Muslims. They brought in the Chinese and Indians into our Malay Penisular for commercial exploitation and only give us Independence if our Sultans allow the Chinese and Indians take up citizenship. Now after 53 years of independence, we are having ugly racism politics. We now have a lot of conflicting incidents between the british anglo saxon laws(at Federal level) with our Islamic Shariah laws which is part of the State constitution.

    Laknatullah…the British

    • Dear Norbaini,
      Thankyou for the feed back,however remember a whenever in history nations like the english who claim now that the term means the Angles if so then spelling should be Anglish,is a nation of pirates and scum of main continent Europe,it was pure luck that their traders carved out an empire for them,as till mid 19th century they did understand the concept of A PUBLIC BATH WHAT TO SPEAK OF WASHING THEIR BODIES,TILL 1801,THEY HAD NO IDEA HOW MANY LIVED ON THEIR ISLAND,IN THAT YEAR THE FIRST CENSUS WAS DONE.WHEN ON A SMALL ISLAND THE STATE HAS NO IDEA,OF ITS PEOPLE AND THEIR LOCATION,OR AFFAIRS,CAN THEY GIVE LAWS TO THE WORLD ??????

    • Muhammad Ali says:

      Naveed I enjoyed your article with great pleasure and the comments by various readers. Historical records never fade or lost. Where ever the Brits peeped in for ateasing their greed due to hungar and lust the end state was nothing but leaving behind the sown seeds of turmoil and hatred. I very strongly believe if today there is so much hatred against the WEST & USA in particular ALL DISCREDIT GOES TO BRITS for leaving behind their slavish cronnies still executing the policy of DIVIDE & RULE. Amongst all colonies where Union Jack was hoisted including America, the one suffered most are the muslims dominated regions for the reasons that these are rich in heritage & resources. Look at Arabian Peninsula and emergence of Sheikhdoms and the division of British India in such a hooch porch manner that Pakistan and Baharat now both as nuclear state will remain on the hunches for all times to come………………….its a high time that Anglo Saxon Laws be made as part of our archives and we need to have our jurisprudence in line to the teaching of our Quran and that is so simple and JUST for all human beings varying in cast creed and religion. Well researched paper and I enjoyed reading your article that brought an addition to my knowledge…………………. lol

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. ISLAM: The Golden Age – Investigating Philosophies, Culture, History, Myths - [...] Anglo-Saxon Law Is The Tool | Opinion Maker – Related web pages www.opinion-maker.org/2010/09/anglo-saxon-law [...]
  2. Islam: The Golden Age – History – Investigating Philosophies, Culture, History, Myths - [...] Anglo-Saxon Law Is The Tool | Opinion Maker – Related web pages www.opinion-maker.org/2010/09/anglo-saxon-law [...]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.