subscribe: Posts | Comments


America Gone Stupid Over Iran


Font Size » Large | Small

Over and again the intelligence community has told the powers that be that Iran is not engaged in a nuclear weapons program. And over and again the men and women in Congress and the White House have insisted that these traditional sources of information are wrong and that the stories that are coming from other sources (in this case the Israeli government and its special interest agents in Washington) know better.

An Analysis

by Lawrence Davidson

Making The Same Mistake Twice

It is estimated that up to a million people died as a function of George Bush Jr.’s decision to invade Iraq. According to Bush, that decision was made on the basis of "faulty intelligence." This is the ex-president’s way of passing the blame. The decision was made by Mr. Bush’s insistence that the accurate intelligence he was getting from traditional sources was false, and that the lies he was being told by other parties were true.

Now there is Iran. Over and again the intelligence community has told the powers that be that Iran is not engaged in a nuclear weapons program. And over and again the men and women in Congress and the White House have insisted that these traditional sources of information are wrong and that the stories that are coming from other sources (in this case the Israeli government and its special interest agents in Washington) know better. As in 2003, so it is in 2012. The politicians appear to be out for blood. One wonders how many dead and maimed bodies will satisfy them? Perhaps it will be a million dead Iranians.

The only difference is that today, we have a president who is hesitant to go to war this very moment. As General Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has put it, the major difference between the U.S. and Israel on military action against Iran is timing. For President Obama, first comes the "diplomacy" of ultimatums combined with draconian sanctions, and then comes the slaughter. Perhaps it will come in his anticipated second term.

I have written about this more than once before and it is hard to find anything new to say. Yet, given the play of events, what has been said before warrants being said again. Therefore, below your will find a piece originally posted on the 10th of June 2011, but amended where necessary to bring it up to date.

Part I – Is there an Iranian Nuclear Weapons Program?

On Friday 3 June 2011 the investigative reporter Seymour Hersh gave an interview to Amy Goodman for the radio program Democracy Now! The topic was Iran and whether or not it is developing nuclear weapons. Hersh answered this question definitively for Goodman as he did shortly thereafter in a comprehensive piece for The New Yorker (6 June 2011 ) entitled "Iran and the Bomb: How Real is the Threat? His answer: there is no Iranian nuclear weapons program. There is no threat. This position has been confirmed by two National Intelligence Estimates (NIEs) on the question of Iran and nuclear weapons. These expressed the collective opinion of 16 U.S. intelligence agencies. Their unanimous conclusion has been that "there is no evidence of any weaponization." This was reconfirmed in mid February 2012 by an array of top U.S. intelligence chiefs appearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee to give their annual report on "current and future worldwide threats" to national security.

Hersh set his understanding of the issue against the background of the 2003 invasion of Iraq. In that case there was no credible evidence for weapons of mass destruction yet we had high government officials going around talking about the next world war and mushroom clouds over American cities. Both the U.S. Congress and the general population bought into this warmongering. Hersh is obviously worried about a replay of that scenario. Thus, in his interview, he said "you could argue its 2003 all over again….There’s just no serious evidence inside that Iran is actually doing anything to make nuclear weapons….So, the fact is…that we have a sanctions program that’s designed to prevent the Iranians from building weapons they’re not building."

In 2003 those kind of sanctions, applied to Iraq, along with the accompanying misinformation campaign, led to a tragic and unnecessary war. Are we now doing it all over again? As Amy Goodman pointed out, "the Obama White House…has repeatedly cited Iran’s nuclear program as a threat to the world." President Obama asserted as much in a 22 May 2011 speech before AIPAC and again in his 4 March 2012 talk to the same organization. On the latter occasion Obama told his audience, "I have said that when it comes to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, I will take no options off the table, and I mean what I say. That includes all elements of American power: a political effort aimed at isolating Iran….an economic effort that imposes crippling sanctions and, yes, a military effort to be prepared for any contingency." All this for something that is simply not happening.

If this is the case, what in the world was President Barack Obama talking about when addressing AIPAC? And what are the members of Congress talking about when they address this same issue? The vast majority of them take the same line not of President Obama, but of Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu who thinks Obama is weak and naive and that their should be war against Iran now. In addition, this morbid fantasizing about Iran’s nuclear ambitions has captured the attention of the mainstream press. Amy Goodman asked Hersh about a New York Times report (24 May 2011) stating "the world’s global nuclear inspection agency [IAEA]…revealed for the first time…that it possesses evidence that Tehran has conducted work on a highly sophisticated nuclear triggering technology that experts said could be used for only one purpose: setting off a nuclear weapon." Hersh quickly pointed out the that the word "evidence" never appeared in the IAEA report and, it turns out, the type of nuclear trigger the New York Times was referring to is so fraught with technical problems that, according to Hersh, "there is no evidence that anybody in their right mind would want to use that kind of a trigger." So, what in the world is the New York Times telling us?

Part II – What is Real?

Questions One and Two: The questions about Iran’s nuclear program are not open ended. They have real answers. First, is Iran developing nuclear energy? The answer to this is a definitive yes. No one, Iranian or otherwise, denies this. Their aim here is energy production and medical applications. This is all legal. Second, is it developing nuclear weapons? According to every reliable expert within the intelligence agencies of both the United States and Europe, the answer is no. These answers describe reality in relation to Iran and its nuclear activities.

Question Three: The really important question. Why do American politicians and military leaders refuse to accept reality as regards this issue? That too must have an answer. And
intelligent people who investigate these matters should be able to figure it out. I consider myself in this crowd, and so I am going to venture forth with my answer.

Answer to question three: It is Politics. However, it is not just U.S. politics. Others have helped write the script. These others can be identified by asking to whom are American officials pledging to pursue the Iranian nuclear weapons fantasy? The president’s pledge has gone to AIPAC and the Israelis. Members of Congress have done the same.

Part III – Other People’s Fears Become America’s Fantasies

Israeli politicians are addicted to the Iran threat. Iran serves, alongside the Palestinians, as the latter day ruthless anti-Semite who would destroy the Jews. Zionists seem to need this kind of "existentialist" enemy. This is the equivalent of the Islamic fundamentalist taking the place of the hateful communist as the great enemy that the United States also seems to need. And, as it turns out, the Israeli lobby is more influential in formulating U.S. foreign policy toward Iran than all of the nation’s intelligence services put together. Hence our politicians from the President on down, chase shadows. Not just verbally, mind you, but in terms of definable policy (like sanctions against Iran).

U.S. politicians and military leaders cannot talk like this and create policy like this without the mainstream press following along. Where there is smoke, there must be fire. Plus, ever since the Iranian hostage crisis (1979-1981), Americans have been told that the Iranians hate us. So, whether it is Fox TV, whose fanatical conservative backers have always lived in a bi-polar fantasy world of good and evil, or the New York Times, whose quasi-liberal backers empathize with Israel just enough to buy into that country’s paranoia, the message is that the Iranians are crazy people out to destroy the West. And the evidence? Who needs it?

Part IV- The Real Danger is Acting on False Assumptions

What happens when a well-armed individual cannot tell the difference between reality and unreality? What happens when a well-armed individual just knows, in his gut, that the other guy is plotting to destroy him? Chances are something horrible will happen. And, the American public ought to know that this is so, because collectively we have already lived out this tragedy in 2003. In that year we had leadership who were much more influenced by their guts, by religious imagery, by duplicitous Iraqi con men, by scheming Zionists and ideologically driven neo-cons, than anything vaguely resembling hard evidence. That "something horrible" cost the lives of up to a million human beings.

So let us get this straight. It seems there are two worlds. The real world of facts and evidence and the unreal world of fantasy. Our political leaders and their advisers are, apparently, stuck in the unreal one. Their words, and their policies, are built on the assumptions of this fantasy world. They go to war and kill people based on beliefs that are demonstrably false. And the rest of us? Most of us are stuck in our own local niches and beyond them we do not know what is real or unreal. So we rely on others to tell us what to believe. Who are the others? They just happen to be our political leaders, their advisers, and follow-the-leader media commentators. Well, that makes a nice little circle. And, a fatal one at that.

GD Star Rating
America Gone Stupid Over Iran, 9.1 out of 10 based on 23 ratings
468 ad
  1. == CNN’s neurolinguistic programming ==

    Try this soundbite from CNN’s advert/interlude : ” . . . can be punished for that opinion” . . . as announcer 1%ter Richard Quest (worth quite a few million) for being a mouth piece) read from the script.

    Freedom of speech, implies that opinions in themselves are not punishable. Much like Voltair’s right to freedom of speech and by extension life. What does CNN mean can be punished (for an opinion)? Any opinion may also be arguable from an ‘existential rights’ standpoint. All persons are equal so why does voicing an opinion result in punishment?!? Disappointing, CNN!

  2. B.I.O Agency.Com says:

    Too late for the U.S. / Israel Axis of Evil
    B.I.O. Agents, inc.

  3. Regardless of Iran having or not having a bomb US and israel will use any pretense to attack and take it over just like Afganistan, Iraq, Lybia Syria ( happening now) Do you start to see the picture?..

  4. Oldtimer says:

    Iran has said they don't want nuclear bombs. They signed the NPT and have abided to IAEA inspections. They have every right to develope the nuclear power they stated they would. Israel on the other hand is illegal in every respect with what they've done and are the ones that should be penalized.

  5. This threat of war with Iran has nothig to do with nuclear weapons bur everything to do with the Bansters wanting control over their money like we have here, control of the oil and money made by the wars in general and finally Israels ugly demands.   Israel doesnt fight its wars anymore they start them and then get others to fight them for them.  Israel isnt in Iraq, Israel isnt in Afghanistan,  Israel isnt in Syria nor did they fight in Egypt.  They are the thrat to peace in this world and it all started a long long time ago with their god Yahweh. 

  6. I remember him recalling whatt his father told him when he was growing up in Eastern Europe. One of them being that when his father was in high school he and a group of friends would skip school early on Fridays and go over to his friend's father's butcher shop. That they would buy at cost any cows , that had not been butchered by the end of the day on Friday before the begining of shabat . They would take the cow home and wash it and then the boys would procede to "beat the udders of the cows so that they would swell up and turn pink" so as to sell them to the "GOYISHE KUP" as milk producing cows.

    The part that I remember him asking me if the East Europeans are so naive, so gullible and so stupid to buy old "non milk producing cows" from a bunch of young Jewish Boys.

    So thinking of it now I agree with the Jewish saying that the "GOYISHE KUP" are indeed" Stupid" as they believe that a Bunch of Arab Muslim Kids who were not able to Fly a Cessna Airplane took it upon themselves to FLY a Boing Jumbo Jet outwitting the US Military and Civilian authorities. The "Jewish Lightning Insurance Scam" of the 1960's is still alive and well has been put to good use by Larry Silverstein with the help of his sayanim jews made a financial killing in imploding wtc  by putting 15 million down and comming out with 7 billion dollars for buidings that no one wanted to buy because it would have cost a billion dollars to remove the asbestos from.  Then on top of that the people in America actually believe that they actually decide who is elected President or for that that actual VOTE is really counted and makes a difference in deciding who represents them in the White House and congress.                                   


    Yeh I agree that the AmericanNon-Jews are indeed  American "GOYISHE KUP" or "STUPID CATTLE"!
    The Israeli Defense Firm That Tallies The Iowa Caucus
    By Christopher Bollyn


    The Iowa caucus is only a few days away and the nation's attention will be directed to the results, which signify the beginning of the U.S. presidential race. But does anyone watch who tallies the results of the Iowa caucus?
    The Iowa caucus results were tallied in 2004 by a company that is headed by a man whose company was bought by Elron Electronics, the Israeli defense firm. I suspect that it will be the same this year. Don't expect to see any grassroots political activists doing the tally in Iowa. The Israeli defense establishment takes care of that part of the American "democratic" election process.
    In the summer of 2004, I first learned that a foreign and out-of-state company using Interactive Voice Response (IVR) technology tallied the Iowa caucus results.
    The system used to tally the 2004 Iowa caucus results was provided by a company called Voxeo, which was apparently based in Orlando, Florida. (Yellow flag goes up in the mind of those familiar with Orlando and electronic vote fraud history


  7. Whatever it is, we do not know for sure . But one thing.. the logical direction is Iran SHOULD have the nukes to protect herself from the mad state that has 200 of them.
    The problem here is Western double standards at its highest… after Syria's issues by these same guys.

  8. Does anyone "think" the President is his own man?  No, others tell him what to do—members of The Pilgrims Society (the World Money Power, explained at the link—just review the start page!)  That's why Prince Philip, The Queen, Paul Volcker, George Shultz, Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller and other Members of the "Hell 666" organization whose motto is "Here And Everywhere" (claiming omnipresence, like God) routinely show up at the White House and State Department.  These people are working to return the world to feudalism under an unaccountable ruling class.  They wrecked the silver money systems of India, China and the Far East, intentionally causing the Great Depression, which led to World War II they want to depopulate the planet of what a member of the Royal family called "useless eaters."

  9. Stephan Larose says:

    For the US dollar, and Western economies in general, to remain supreme, it is paramount to control the world's oil and make sure it is traded exclusively in dollars as without the oil "backing" the dollar, the dollar, quantitatively eased to near worthlessness already, would collapse. This is not about nuclear weapons, this is about US hegemony, and the Iranians, unlike the Saudis, Jordanians, Qataris, and until recently the Egyptions, do not take their marching orders from Washington.
    Thus, despite the arguments for war being completely invalid, and any act of war a certain war crime, war will be waged, and any president attempting to avert such a scenario faces an increased probability of assassination.
    There must be war to preserve American hegemony, one which would also collapse if the American people were to focus their attention on the domestic elite criminals bankrupting their nation instead of some external boogeyman promising "existential" destruction with (fictional) nukes. War's primary purpose is domestic control.

  10. Flemming says:

    Now I got it! “Part II” is asking “What is Real?” and the answer is:
    …The questions about Iran’s nuclear program are not open ended. They have real answers. First, is Iran developing nuclear energy? The answer to this is a definitive yes.
    Second, is it developing nuclear weapons? According to every reliable expert within the intelligence agencies of both the United States and Europe, the answer is no.
    These answers describe reality in relation to Iran and its nuclear activities.
    The entire article assumes that reality.
    So, it seem, the ultimate solution for the world politics is to install a “reliable expert” to rule the world. Bongo bingo, no more disputes, no risk of nuclear attack.


  1. L’America ha agito da stupida in merito all’Iran « GilGuySparks - [...] [...]
  2. L’America sta cannando sull’Iran | Informare per Resistere - [...] [...]
  3. America Gone Stupid (Again) Over Iran - [...] Filed Under: Politics, War [...]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.