subscribe: Posts | Comments

leader

WHY PAKISTAN CANNOT REASSERT

4 comments

An Absence of a National Narrative

By Brig Samson S Sharaf

Pakistan makes an intriguing study of paradoxes and contradictions in each sinew of its politic body and in every sense of the word. At one end is its rich history and struggle of a Muslim Identity morphing through the Mohamadan Education Conference to All India Muslim League that distanced itself from the rebellion of 1857 to the Khilafat Movement. Both are now the salient of our invented history in just the opposite sense. The metamorphosis of a small Aligarh Movement to All India Muslim League was fire-balled through compulsions of the political economy; yet we witness each day the idea becoming an anathema to those who rule the street through radicalism. Pakistan was created on democratic principles of a modern nation state; yet the true journey is obscured through surgical procedures carried out by butchers. It has resulted in a false sense of historic greatness responsible for a mindset of vulnerability and denial that breeds confrontation and unidirectional development of national aspirations. Religion wherever expedient, has been selectively used to sustain this narrative. This is the centre piece of the mindset that prowls the country and society.

The people of Pakistan are repeatedly led to concede that the Security of Pakistan is a paradigm centring India and the cantankerous Hindu Mindset (fitting the religious divide theory) notwithstanding the grief and indignity we cause to the Hindus in Pakistan who have played an outstanding role for the country they chose to live in.  Equally important questions of national security like socio-economic development, education and developmental economics are best left vague and unanswered.

In the past sixty years, the distribution of the annual national budgets empirically alludes to this argument. However, more conspicuous than this unequal distribution of incidental national resources is the glaring absence of a strategy towards development of the social capital and national resource. Given that Pakistan’s security perspectives warrant a strong and efficient defence establishment, what stopped the national planners from making and implementing plans to boost the gross domestic and national products to ensure that equally important, other elements of national power did not suffer at a cost? Had they planned so, the entire burden of foreign debt and defence expenditure would have been dwarfed by growth in a country rich in natural resources, entrepreneurship, skilled labour and business adventurists.

Unfortunately, Pakistan’s economic paradigm was successively built around a Dependency Paradigm through loans, tied aid and trade, and budgetary shortfalls. External and internal borrowing, lopsided taxation measures and unwillingness to expand the tax net were the short term solution to bridging deficits. The past sixty years of budgetary figures empirically support this argument. This has led to a scenario wherein Pakistan a nuclear state though militarily strong is economically dependent and fragile. As a result we compromise national interests for economic sustenance and repeatedly shoot ourselves in the foot. What use is our gold if the country rots?

This massive disconnect and the glaring absence of a broad based National Narrative provides the conducive environments for a select group and coterie to seize and exercise political clout; something I frequently refer to as “The Mindset of 1935: Pakistan’s Achilles Heels” (Nation 10/1/2010).

At the core of this mindset is the defence establishment that took over and evolved a security state through both direct and indirect military interventions. The security perspectives in this threat assessment ignored other elements of national power and relegated them to a bureaucracy that was trained on the Harvard Model. The defence and intelligence establishments also followed suite on the lines of CIA and Pentagon; an explanation why India and Pakistan took different courses in post 1947. Romantic revolutionaries who formed the vanguard of Pakistan movement were replaced by turn coats and fly by night reformers who were more accommodative of this idea. This coterie drew additional strength from the strong US handshake briefly disturbed by the populism of the 70s. As a result all politicians who have ruled Pakistan are insiders who have been groomed at some stage by this coterie.

As a direct consequence, Pakistan’s overall development has been lopsided and unsustainable. The overarching mindset has curtailed the evolution of all other elements of national power. This imbalance has less to do with the uneven distribution and more with total apathy and disregard to indigenous policies of home led growth-consumption and competitive exports. The policy is also sustained through the absence to undertake fast track national development projects (an anathema to the Economics Affairs Division), exploiting the skilled and white collar work force, exploring national resources and technological interfaces.

Pakistan’s budgetary figures evidence this argument. As a result Pakistan looses far more in economic sovereignty than it gains through an efficient war machine and nuclear deterrence. To the contrary, this economic fickleness and dependence makes nuclear nuisance irrelevant as proved by the Drone and Raymond theories. Pakistan is the only nuclear armed country of the world where outside interventions in all forms and manifestations are a daily chore exercised with impunity, where the state provides security to foreign criminals and where the state is ever-ready to take over missions of outside powers.  

Within this mindset, political elites have little space left to them; and they choose to play second fiddle. While some of them have been in cahoots with the establishment, the more revolutionary over a period of time have bleached themselves of their true colours and adapted within the system that rewards allegiance through corruptions. They have also developed an elastic conscience to pick and choose what is right for them. This pathetic state of affairs over the past ten years has morphed into a fine tuned political system in which every political party has a stake in power in some nook and corner. The entire state apparatus including the election commission, electoral laws, constitutional amendments and procedures are adapted to sustain the status quo. With so many stake holders, national consensus appears the logical conclusion. In reality it is not so because these stake holders have diverse and often opposing interests and cancel out each other.

With a system such as this in place, it is futile to be talking of national honour and dignity. This establishment has the full backing of the voters who put them in power. Those who cry foul and criticise, neither turn out to cast their vote nor are willing to come out on the streets. Drones and Raymond Davis will continue to happen and Pakistani establishment continue to play to the familiar tune.

The narrative cannot change if this silent majority is not ready to take to the streets and brave suicide bombings, lathi charges and long stays in the dungeons.



GD Star Rating
loading...
WHY PAKISTAN CANNOT REASSERT, 10.0 out of 10 based on 4 ratings
468 ad
  1. anadianant says:

    What a balanced piece. And waht a tragic testimony to the cancer of divide and rule left behind in our midst. Even as two nations, we could have co-existed in peace. What is happening in pakistan is tragic, beyond comprehension.
    Unfortunately, here in India, it's not misslies and bombs, it's socio-political strangulation by the self same interests. And it seems the gulf has been driven so deep, we cannot cross it, except for something exceptional to occur. Probably bad, given the world today.
    http://aadivaahan.wordpress.com/2010/07/13/whither-india/

  2. p.a.travers says:

    If Australian politics wasn't so dangerous to the world including Pakistan there would be relief in knowing that the Pakistani peoples still,remarkably  so, have some cultural senses of intelligence.Going on right now is a strange thing called a debate about Carbon Tax,and justifications by Government and ex Government people about the imposition of the No Fly zone.Gareth Evans ex-ALP mouthing off at the Sydney Morning Herald web site claims to be the instigator of the Protect part of this.Couldn't help himself,I supppose being "successful " means being recognised back at home.But not say as a unprotected witness in Libya.So be gentle on your ownnation,I say.Australia heading to be a spent force like the U.S.A. U.K. and France, may mean Pakistan will not ned to retreat.Hang on in there.Please.Unfortunately Nuke matters also dominate my mind.Watch the strangers in your midsts still closely.With Gareth Evans speaking ,he may not even know consciously he is signalling something.Be careful not to over criticise your Armed Forces.And take care.

  3. p.a.travers says:

    If Australian politics wasn't so dangerous to the world including Pakistan there would be relief in knowing that the Pakistani peoples still,remarkably  so, have some cultural senses of intelligence.Going on right now is a strange thing called a debate about Carbon Tax,and justifications by Government and ex Government people about the imposition of the No Fly zone.Gareth Evans ex-ALP mouthing off at the Sydney Morning Herald web site claims to be the instigator of the Protect part of this.Couldn't help himself,I suppose being "successful " means being recognised back at home.But not say as a unprotected witness in Libya.So be gentle on your own nation,I say. Australia heading to be a spent force like the U.S.A. U.K. and France, may mean Pakistan will not need to retreat.Hang on in there. Please. Unfortunately Nuke matters also dominate my mind. Watch the strangers in your midsts still ..closely. With Gareth Evans speaking , he may not even know consciously he is signalling something. Be careful not to over criticise your Armed Forces. And take care.

  4. very well written piece of information based on fact, i salute mr samson for his intelligent review!
    recently one of my friends was invited to govt house to meet mr 50% zardari, chief thief of pakistan, as he wanted permission to set up a sugar mill. after waiting to meet zardari for 2 hours he was told that he has been granted permission as long as  zardari has 50% ownership!!!
    my friend refused that this is not viable upon which he was charged 100,s of thousands of rupees just for waiting to meet the zardari thief without doing so, his car was impounded until he paid up!!
    i have to ask paksitani nationals, how low will you stoop to these robbers and thiefs in your midst who are also killers and rapists!!!
    dare i mention a lady i know who was kidnapped by the police and raped for 2 weeks in they safe houses in lahore and was then brought before a magistrate on the guise of running away from her husband and child by a thanedar to be put in a dar al aman!
    to save her life all charges were dropped so that she could go back to her family in safety by her appointed solicitor.
    you have wolves guarding the sheep mr samson, the time is for action to uplift humanity and dignity of all men and women and i wish you success in your country for that struggle. kaffirs are known to be antihuman but those in our midst posing as our protectors are worse it seems or  on par with the foreign infidels!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>